Le 2020-07-02 11:59, Florian Weimer a écrit :
* Nicolas Mailhot via devel:
Le 2020-07-02 09:59, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel a écrit :
On 02.07.2020 07:35, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote:
The detached changelog is just one more file in SRPM sources, which
is
modified by rpmbuild at `%build` time with other files rpmbuild
modifies.
I don't like that. %changelog should be generated automatically on
Koji
side.
Why? Koji schedules a build.
No, Koji also builds the SRPM, via fedpkg-simple or a similar
mechanism.
Sure, by build I intended both the deployment packages and the SRPM.
The main difference between the current workflow (the reason it fails in
mock right now, but that should not be too hard to fix) is that the SRPM
that includes the build info is itself a result of the rest of the
build.
That seems the main point people misunderstand (thank you for making me
clarify it), the proposal does not involve preparing a special SRPM out
of band, that is then fed to koji, the SRPM containing the bumped
changelog and last build info is the result of the build process
alongside the binary packages.
mock (and koji) just have to pick this SRPM at the end of the build and
not use the SRPM as it existed before the build occurred.
And why is it that way? You do not consider a rpmbuild -bs a build event
do you? We do it all the time to import packages from one system to
another. The only thing which is a real build that produces a bump and
is stored in changelog history is a full rpmbuild -ba build.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Mailhot
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
