On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 4:01 PM Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851783
The main argument is that for typical and varied workloads in Fedora,
mostly on consumer hardware, we should use mq-deadline scheduler
rather than either none or bfq.
It may be true most folks with NVMe won't see anything bad with none,
but those who have heavier IO workloads are likely to be better off
with mq-deadline.
How would one go about forcing the scheduler as to experiment to see if there is any perceived difference between them?
Thanks,
Richard
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
