https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851783 The main argument is that for typical and varied workloads in Fedora, mostly on consumer hardware, we should use mq-deadline scheduler rather than either none or bfq. It may be true most folks with NVMe won't see anything bad with none, but those who have heavier IO workloads are likely to be better off with mq-deadline. Further details are in the bug, but let's discuss it on list. Thanks! -- Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
