On 29 June 2020 08:26:21 CEST, "John M. Harris Jr" <johnmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >On Sunday, June 28, 2020 5:37:08 PM MST Chris Adams wrote: >> Once upon a time, John M. Harris Jr <johnmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> said: >> >> > XFS proved to be troublesome, and still is up to the latest of RHEL7. It's >> > not uncommon to have to run xfs_repair on smaller XFS partitions, >> > especially / boot. I'm not sure if btrfs has the same issue there? >> >> >> [citation needed] >> >> I haven't run xfs_repair in probably 15 years (and so never on Fedora or >> RHEL/CentOS). > >I haven't had time to figure out why the RHEL systems I have that are >(mistakenly I assume, though they were created before I was hired) using XFS >run into that issue, after about a month, they report 100% disk space >utilization on /boot, and I've gotta run xfs_repair in order to fix that. In >the unlikely event that I have the time to figure out why, before I just re- >install them (which is already planned), I'd be happy to follow up with a >citation. :) That is very odd. I haven't seen it once in over a decade in an environment with thousands of machines. Very interesting though, I think I will have to try to replicate this. Is there anything special about them like odd partition layout etc? M _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
