Re: User experience issue on btrfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 09:20:32AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 4:11 pm, Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > Maybe libvirt / gnome-boxes / virt-manager should do that by default if
> > it detects that the backing storage for an allocated VM image is on
> > btrfs (if it doesn't do that already)?
> 
> Yeah that's the plan: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-boxes/-/issues/88

  But disabling CoW (and checksumming, which is implied by nocow)
removes important reliability features from btrfs.  It's a trade off
which should be clear to the user.

-- 
Tomasz Torcz                                                       72->|   80->|
tomek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx                                               72->|   80->|
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux