On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 2:05 PM Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 8:45 pm, Markus Larsson <qrsbrwn@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > I strongly agree. BTRFS has been 5 years from production ready for > > almost a decade now, please don't force this on users that doesn't > > know any better. > > This is hard to square with the fact that it's already being used in > production on millions of systems. It's also hard to square with the > data presented by Josef -- the only hard evidence I've seen on the > topic of filesystem reliability -- which shows btrfs is an order of > magnitude more reliable than xfs (although we don't know how it > compares to ext4). Surely if xfs is good enough for RHEL, and btrfs is > at least 10x more reliable than xfs, that suggests btrfs should > probably be good enough for Fedora? > Saying production on millions of systems is a bit misleading here, when you are talking about millions of systems at a single company. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
