Dne 26. 06. 20 v 15:17 Ben Cotton napsal(a): > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 9:14 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 01:59:39PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: >>> Which is better? default or defaults? I don't have a preference. >> I went with "-defaults" in this case because the package provides "the >> default configuration", i.e. "defaults". >> >> This doesn't translate exactly to the nano case, which is about making >> the program the default "plugin" in another program (git). >> > What about something like "default-editor"? Shouldn't it be independent package then? Or shouldn't all editors have subpackage like this? Vít > That way it's more obvious > from the name what it actually does. If we later decide to change the > default editor, we update that package (and spins/labs, power users, > etc can exclude that package in kickstarts if they don't want it) > > > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
