On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 9:14 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 01:59:39PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > > Which is better? default or defaults? I don't have a preference. > > I went with "-defaults" in this case because the package provides "the > default configuration", i.e. "defaults". > > This doesn't translate exactly to the nano case, which is about making > the program the default "plugin" in another program (git). > What about something like "default-editor"? That way it's more obvious from the name what it actually does. If we later decide to change the default editor, we update that package (and spins/labs, power users, etc can exclude that package in kickstarts if they don't want it) -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
