On 6/24/20 6:03 PM, Joe Doss wrote:
On 6/24/20 4:28 PM, Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote:
It was akmod-wireguard (thanks Laura, Alexander, Joe, Leigh and Ian).
This leaves the question: Shouldn't kernel>5.6.0 obsolete
kmod-wireguard and akmod-wireguard? and maybe replace wireguard with
wireguard-tools?
Looking at this RPM's change log it looks like they are doing that:
* Tue Apr 14 2020 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx> - 0.0.20191219-3
- Disable wireguard until obsoleted
https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpkgs.rpmfusion.org%2Fcgit%2Ffree%2Fwireguard-kmod.git%2Fcommit%2F%3Fh%3Df31%26id%3D2c0a54bad7eed78c459a5f41ff1f4d71070e626c&data=02%7C01%7Cprzemek.klosowski%40nist.gov%7C72bf9d15a42c41a41ad508d8188a65d0%7C2ab5d82fd8fa4797a93e054655c61dec%7C1%7C0%7C637286329984886856&sdata=wYJ8LNnqzWUrMIR8cHqDsWICFBeYYnzY8PIJsXipNH0%3D&reserved=0
I think that just prevents the installation of the module---I was
puzzled why the module is getting created in the first place, and the
answer was akmod-wireguard.
I argued that newer kernel installs should cause erasing of the
wireguard-related packages, even though they came from a different
repository (rpmfusion-free*).
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
