|
On 6/24/20 8:56 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 08:14:39AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 3:38 AM Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 06:51:36AM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:Yes. Putting the "stream identification" into the package name is the most natural solution, and has been floated various times.This already happens. But not in Fedora. In RHEL, modular packages have Modularitylabel RPM tag that carries the module name and stream.The ModularityLabel RPM tag is also present in Fedora.Interesting. I checked the first modular package for the first module "dnf module list" gives in Fedora 33 (ant-0:1.10.5-3.module_f28+4207+d722d224.noarch), and it does not contain the tag. I did not checked other ones. Thus I wrote that it was not in Fedora. Now I see that the package was built on Fedora 28 platform. When I check the latest build in Koji, ant-1.10.7-2.module_f31+7074+f8e1675d.noarch, the tag is there. My apology. Probably the new tag was enabled sometime in between and nobody cared to rebuild the module after that (although relengs mass-rebuild modules on branching) and nobody cared to submit to latest build to stable. FWIW, other F31 packages with it are: gimp gimp:2.10:3120191106095052:f636be4b
|
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
