On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 06:51:36AM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > I think there's some fear that "name mangling" is not a general > solution, and we'd have cases where names conflict. I think the > concern is realistic, but not a big issue in practice. With some > careful naming guidelines we are able to resolve naming conflicts, and > I'm sure we could extend the guidelines to multiple versions of language > stacks or whatever. We'd probably have slightly longer names or packages, > but that's not the end of the world. > Namespacing RPM package names is only a tip of the iceberg. You need to namespace RPM requires, provides, shared library sonames, shared library symbols, header files, header file symbols, pkg-config files, manual pages, cross references in the manual pages, executable names etc. You need to namespace everything if you aim for a parallel installability. That's the reason why modularity does not tackle it and instead conflicts the concurent versions by filtering the packages from the concurent streams. -- Petr
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
