On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 2:54 PM David Cantrell <dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 08:44:39AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > >Hopefully that provides some context and helps FESCo and the wider > >community understand where Red Hat is headed with modularity on the > >Enterprise side. > > Around the idea and concept of modularity... what are the benefits to Fedora, > Fedora developers, and Fedora contributors? Through the various discussions > on modularity, nothing solid in this regard has been presented. If I am > Fedora contributor now, what can modularity do for me? > > Most of the remainder of this thread talks about the problems with the > implementation as it exists today and problems with other known options. > Putting that aside for now, why should Fedora contributors care about > modularity? > > Put another way, what does the developer experience look like for modularity? These are good questions, but I feel like there has been about 2+ years of discussion and debate about what Fedora could get out of modularity. I'm not sure I have anything to offer that is directly new or better. I do think that ELN presents a new opportunity for those that have already found value in the Fedora community to use and improve it there in the absence of widespread Fedora adoption. Perhaps that would allow a place for the ideas to grow and could prove to be illustrative. At any rate, my goal isn't to evangelize or convert Fedora to suddenly embrace modularity wholescale. I am simply offering clarity on the plans for RHEL 9 with this technology. josh _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
