On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 09:39:47AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > > Yeah, I think that'd be better then simply dropping them, if it's > > reasonably easy to implement. By releasing those updates we make > > things a bit nicer for users who are staying on a > > now-slightly-but-as-time-goes-on-more-and-more-so out-of-date release, > > and we'd be conserving the work of our packagers. But if it would be a > > major hassle for infra or releng, then meh. > > > > I think a phased approach would be (hopefully) easy to implement. > > 1. Stop builds at <date> > 2. Stop submitting updates on <date>+1 week 2½. Push to stable all updates with non-negative karma at <date>+2 weeks? > 3. Stop allowing pushes to stable on <date>+2 weeks. -- Tomasz Torcz Only gods can safely risk perfection, tomek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx it's a dangerous thing for a man. — Alia _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
