Re: Boost packages conflict

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yes, after system installed on hard drive the same error.
But after upgrading boost* error is gone and packages normal installed.

пт, 15 мая 2020 г. в 00:33, Vascom <vascom2@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> I just could reproduce it.
>
> Steps:
> 1. Run KDE spin F32 in virt-manager.
> 2. dnf install toolnix
>
> Result:
>
>  mkvtoolnix               x86_64      46.0.0-1.fc32       updates      5.2 M
> Installing dependencies:
>  boost169-filesystem      x86_64      1.69.0-6.fc32       fedora        53 k
>  boost169-system          x86_64      1.69.0-6.fc32       fedora        12 k
>  fmt                      x86_64      6.2.1-1.fc32        updates      115 k
>  libebml                  x86_64      1.3.10-2.fc32       fedora        87 k
>  libmatroska              x86_64      1.5.2-2.fc32        fedora       178 k
>  pugixml                  x86_64      1.10-2.fc32         fedora       100 k
>
> ...
> Error: Transaction test error:
>   file /usr/lib64/libboost_system.so.1.69.0 from install of
> boost169-system-1.69.0-6.fc32.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
> boost-system-1.69.0-15.fc32.x86_64
>
> So I think after installation result will be the same. May be need
> first dnf upgrade.
>
> пт, 15 мая 2020 г. в 00:10, Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx>:
> >
> > On Thu, 14 May 2020 20:08:07 -0000
> > "Denis Arnaud" <denis.arnaud_fedora@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > > No one try to install it now. New boost will be in F33 only.
> > > >
> > > > But if boost not installed in system and user want install for
> > > > example libreoffice he will get this error and can't install any
> > > > package requires boost.
> > > >
> > > > boost169 must be removed from F32 repos at all.
> > > >
> > > > чт, 14 мая 2020 г. в 22:19, Samuel Sieb <samuel(a)sieb.net&gt;:
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5/14/20 10:49 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > > > > > The boost169 compatibility package conflicts with the regular
> > > > > > boost on Fedora 32. Both packages provides the same libraries.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Error: Transaction test error:
> > > > > >    file /usr/lib64/libboost_system.so.1.69.0 from install of
> > > > > > boost169-system-1.69.0-6.fc32.x86_64 conflicts with file from
> > > > > > package boost-system-1.69.0-15.fc32.x86_64
> > > > >
> > > > > What's the point of having a compatibility package for the same
> > > > > version as the regular one?  I'm guessing that means they're in
> > > > > the process of preparing a new release, but why are you trying to
> > > > > install it now? _______________________________________________
> > > > > devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to
> > > > > devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:
> > > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > > > > List Guidelines:
> > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List
> > > > > Archives:
> > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > No one try to install it now. New boost will be in F33 only.
> > > >
> > > > But if boost not installed in system and user want install for
> > > > example libreoffice he will get this error and can't install any
> > > > package requires boost.
> > > >
> > > > boost169 must be removed from F32 repos at all.
> > > >
> > > > чт, 14 мая 2020 г. в 22:19, Samuel Sieb <samuel(a)sieb.net&gt;:
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5/14/20 10:49 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > > > > > The boost169 compatibility package conflicts with the regular
> > > > > > boost on Fedora 32. Both packages provides the same libraries.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Error: Transaction test error:
> > > > > >    file /usr/lib64/libboost_system.so.1.69.0 from install of
> > > > > > boost169-system-1.69.0-6.fc32.x86_64 conflicts with file from
> > > > > > package boost-system-1.69.0-15.fc32.x86_64
> > > > >
> > > > > What's the point of having a compatibility package for the same
> > > > > version as the regular one?  I'm guessing that means they're in
> > > > > the process of preparing a new release, but why are you trying to
> > > > > install it now? _______________________________________________
> > > > > devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to
> > > > > devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:
> > > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > > > > List Guidelines:
> > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List
> > > > > Archives:
> > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Yes, boost169 should never have ended up in Fedora 32 in the first
> > > place (blame on me, sorry). The thing is that we can no longer block
> > > it: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9455
> >
> > I think an update of fedora-obsolete-packages could "virtually" remove
> > boost169, without touching boost itself.
> >
> >
> >                 Dan
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux