> No one try to install it now. New boost will be in F33 only. > > But if boost not installed in system and user want install for example > libreoffice he will get this error and can't install any package > requires boost. > > boost169 must be removed from F32 repos at all. > > чт, 14 мая 2020 г. в 22:19, Samuel Sieb <samuel(a)sieb.net>: > > > > On 5/14/20 10:49 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > > The boost169 compatibility package conflicts with the regular boost on > > > Fedora 32. Both packages provides the same libraries. > > > > > > Error: Transaction test error: > > > file /usr/lib64/libboost_system.so.1.69.0 from install of > > > boost169-system-1.69.0-6.fc32.x86_64 conflicts with file from package > > > boost-system-1.69.0-15.fc32.x86_64 > > > > What's the point of having a compatibility package for the same version > > as the regular one? I'm guessing that means they're in the process of > > preparing a new release, but why are you trying to install it now? > > _______________________________________________ > > devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > No one try to install it now. New boost will be in F33 only. > > But if boost not installed in system and user want install for example > libreoffice he will get this error and can't install any package > requires boost. > > boost169 must be removed from F32 repos at all. > > чт, 14 мая 2020 г. в 22:19, Samuel Sieb <samuel(a)sieb.net>: > > > > On 5/14/20 10:49 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > > The boost169 compatibility package conflicts with the regular boost on > > > Fedora 32. Both packages provides the same libraries. > > > > > > Error: Transaction test error: > > > file /usr/lib64/libboost_system.so.1.69.0 from install of > > > boost169-system-1.69.0-6.fc32.x86_64 conflicts with file from package > > > boost-system-1.69.0-15.fc32.x86_64 > > > > What's the point of having a compatibility package for the same version > > as the regular one? I'm guessing that means they're in the process of > > preparing a new release, but why are you trying to install it now? > > _______________________________________________ > > devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Yes, boost169 should never have ended up in Fedora 32 in the first place (blame on me, sorry). The thing is that we can no longer block it: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9455 So, we have to add obsolete rules for all the sub-packages. Working on it right now. Something like, in boost.spec on Fedora 32 (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/boost/blob/f32/f/boost.spec): %package component Summary: Run-time component of boost atomic library Provides: boost169-component-1.69.0-7 Obsoletes: boost169-component-1.69.0-7 Whereas the latest release of boost169 on Fedora 32 is 1.69.0-6 (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/boost169/blob/d8812637e7d612a21cafb6dd0e2b351884bc82f5/f/boost169.spec#_56). __ On Rawhide, it has been retired, so that the issue does not come up again in the future with other Fedora releases. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
