On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 12:47:51PM +0000, virgo wrote: > > I recommend you to ask the question about v2 support on Fedora Bugzilla for= > > > > the > > > > libcgroup package > > <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?classification=3DFedora&component= > > =3Dlibcgroup&product=3DFedora&query_format=3Dadvanced>. > Prior to the top post, I went through the Bugzilla tickets, with these > parameters: > > * component=libcgroup > * order=changeddate DESC > * product=Fedora > * query_format=advanced > > and the hits dating back to 2015[fn:1] were just a dozen, none making mention > of v2. So, I am not sure whether opening feature requests would help. Fedora uses systemd that enforces cgroup v2. If libcgroup package is not compatible with cgroup v2, then libcgroup package is not compatible with Fedora and this is a bug and should be reported to the Fedora's Bugzilla. > By the way, what would you and (and others) recommend as a replacement for > libcgroup-tools?[fn:2] No idea. I don't use cgroups for anything on purpose. As far as I know, cgroups membership in Fedora is defined by systemd's logind. Whether it suits your needs, I have no idea. I also think it's possible to manage the membership manually by editing files in cgroup2 pseudo file system. -- Petr
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
