Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12. 05. 20 10:27, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Actually, it should be also useful if position of each abstaining FESCo
member was explained. Because for myself, I can interpret 5 people
abstaining just as a lack of understanding of the issue and nothing else.

For me, it was that. I wasn't able to grasp the change proposal quickly, would need to dedicate more time to it and I prioritized other things, abstaining as in: "I trust other members understand this issue better than me and they will decide the good way."

However, it turned out that there was simply too many of 0 votes, hence I bit the bullet and decided to vote in favor, trusting the change owners they know what they are doing.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux