Re: Fedora Mini

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 00:15 -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> Hi, Guys:
> 
> I am looking at a way to use a 486 laptop as an AP, and I see significant
> advantages to using some derivative of Fedora. If packaging can be kept
> the same, things like bash, linux-utils, and modutils can be shared.
> I looked over source-based and embedded distros and the field looks
> terribly splintered. It's hard to pick a distro which won't disappear
> next week. Also, since most of them are amateurish operations, they
> tend towards things like dietlibc or uclibc, busybox, etc. Such approach
> is too limiting for my needs.

Have you tried/contacted the rule project?
http://rule-project.org/
I have not used it since 2003 and Redhat 9, when we finally ditched the
last of our 166/200Mhz 64meg PCs.

> 
> I am curious if anyone thought about starting some sort of "Small Server"
> fork of Fedora. I figure it's not something that is a pure fantasy,
> considering that Spot manages Aurora all by himself. Come to think of it,
> what forks and derivatives of Fedora do we know?
> 
> -- Pete
> 

-- 
David Mohring <heretic@xxxxxxxxxx>


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux