On 11/05/2020 13:02, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 6:03 PM Tom Hughes <tom@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 08/05/2020 21:18, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 6:26 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 01. 05. 20 22:21, Ben Cotton wrote:
* Proposal owners:
The packages are already built for Fedora 33 in a non-default module
stream. On June 14th, 2020, the nodejs-14.x packages will become the
default in Fedora 33 (either by making the 14.x module stream be the
default stream or by rebuilding the packages as non-modular, depending
on other factors).
Will there be an attempted mass rebuild of the dependent packages?
We're going to request a side-tag and rebuild all of the `nodejs-*`
packages. Anything that fails will need to have an FTBFS bug filed.
Why? We're never done that for Node.js upgrades before, and it's
only the binary modules which actually need to be rebuilt...
Well, we don't have a way of detecting which are binary modules and
which aren't, so far as I know.
I have a list in the script I normally use to rebuild them.
Also, assuming packages are following the guidelines, they should all
at least have the %{__nodejs} -e 'require("./")' test enabled, so we
can at least find out if there are any Node.js modules that cannot
even load.
Excuse me while I try and stop laughing.
I guess it will get of a few hundred more node modules anyway
which is something.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (tom@xxxxxxxxxx)
http://compton.nu/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
