On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 6:03 PM Tom Hughes <tom@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 08/05/2020 21:18, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 6:26 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 01. 05. 20 22:21, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >>> * Proposal owners:
> >>> The packages are already built for Fedora 33 in a non-default module
> >>> stream. On June 14th, 2020, the nodejs-14.x packages will become the
> >>> default in Fedora 33 (either by making the 14.x module stream be the
> >>> default stream or by rebuilding the packages as non-modular, depending
> >>> on other factors).
> >>
> >> Will there be an attempted mass rebuild of the dependent packages?
> >
> > We're going to request a side-tag and rebuild all of the `nodejs-*`
> > packages. Anything that fails will need to have an FTBFS bug filed.
>
> Why? We're never done that for Node.js upgrades before, and it's
> only the binary modules which actually need to be rebuilt...
>
Well, we don't have a way of detecting which are binary modules and
which aren't, so far as I know.
Also, assuming packages are following the guidelines, they should all
at least have the %{__nodejs} -e 'require("./")' test enabled, so we
can at least find out if there are any Node.js modules that cannot
even load.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
