Re: Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09. 05. 20 22:58, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
On Friday, May 8, 2020 7:24:14 AM MST Richard Shaw wrote:
Not that it's a huge deal for me but I wouldn't call the upgrade smooth.

There were a bunch of python2 packages that needed to be removed which
necessitated --allowerasing which I've never had to do before.

I noticed this as well, and it's a damned shame. It would have been nice if
these packages could have been kept. They still work, even now, and are still
widely used.

Could you please provide the list of packages you have noticed needed --allowerasing?

Could you please provide a list of packages that have been removed but are still widely used?

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux