Re: Modularity Survey

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> Let's be honest, this doesn't even really make sense for RHEL.

I agree that the current design of Modularity is inherently flawed (because 
it allows version conflicts to happen that cannot be resolved by the user), 
but in the context of RHEL, I can see where the demand comes from, whereas 
in Fedora, the problem Modularity is trying to solve did not exist to begin 
with.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux