Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mi, 15.04.20 07:10, Pavel Raiskup (praiskup@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:

> On Tuesday, April 14, 2020 9:23:27 PM CEST Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/systemd-resolved
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> > Enable systemd-resolved by default. ...
>
> We had serious headaches because racy systemd-resolved got enabled for
> some unknown reasons on copr builders before (and my host as well, for
> example).  I filled bug [1] and then I was told that nobody
> tests/maintains systemd-resolved... why on earth I'd opt-in to use that.
>
> Can we fix the bug, so the generated resolv.conf pointing to local server
> does work _immediately_ inside mock, and isn't it port-triggered (or what
> it is :-))?
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1710699

For the sake of the archives, let's follow-up the discussion on this
specific issue on the bug report, instead of the ML.

Lennart

--
Lennart Poettering, Berlin
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux