On Mon, Apr 13, 2020, at 5:21 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Honestly, degraded performance is an expected result of doing component > build, so I would say that's just not a bug at all, it's just how > Chromium works. Our hand is forced here by upstream's strange and > unusual packaging decisions. Other distros do it this way too. > > But you say the difference is *noticeable*, i.e. noticeable to users > when not doing benchmarks? That sounds weird. > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 9:56 am, Tom Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > This is my dilemma. (It is not my only dilemma, nor my most pressing, > > but it is still mine.) That said, I would love to get input from > > other smart Fedorans as to what I should do here. > > Naive proposal: chromium-freeworld could completely rebuild Chromium > and Obsoletes the entire Fedora package? It could have an epoch ahead > of the Fedora package such that the rpmfusion version is always > preferred even if the Fedora package updates a bit? Then > chromium-libs-media-freeworld can go away and the main Fedora package > can do a static build and you get working krb5. Is there a downside to > this approach that I'm missing? > > Are the benchmark results available somewhere? What exactly was measured in those benchmarks? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
