On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 15:35 +0100, Leigh Griffin wrote: > > > Does it mean you didn't consider dist-git<->zuul integration vs. Gitlab > > CI? I.e. technical differences and advantages of each? If you did, can you, > > please, publish it? It would be valuable info for the community and > > something we can comment on. > > > > Gitlab CI was not part of our evaluation, we are aware it's a service that > is offered but did not evaluate it as it wasn't within the scope of our > exercise. So, how does that track with this quote from the decision blog post? "Some top level requirements which helped us arrive at this decision [to choose Gitlab]: There is a need for CentOS Stream to integrate with a kernel workflow that is an automated bot driven merging solution (merge trains). This allows for richer CI capabilities and minimises the need for human interaction" If you did not evaluate Gitlab CI (and presumably CI capabilities of the three systems more widely), how did the need for a CI feature - that is what "merge trains" are - act as a "top level requirement" which "helped us arrive at this decision"? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
