On 04. 04. 20 14:56, Richard Shaw wrote:
Perhaps this has been discussed already but I found the new user side tags a
much easier process than using buildroot overrides.
Is the only *effective* difference that with a buildroot override that
*everyone* can use it (on purpose or not) and with side tags only the creator
(or users shared to) can use the package?
Yes please! Especially for highly depended on packages (e.g. gcc/annobin), this
should really be the default.
Just to simply things I would be in favor of using side tags across the board
and dropping buildroot overrides but there's probably some situations I'm not
thinking of.
For an update that can potentially break other packages building, I submit a
buildroot override before pushing it to stable to see how the Koschei builds are
affected. That could be solved on Koschei level by including updates-testing by
default somehow.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
