On Thu, 2020-04-02 at 16:48 -0700, Erich Eickmeyer wrote: > > The root of this leadership failure seems to be that the discussion happened > mostly behind closed doors without any announcement *to this list* that this > was being discussed. Transparency is *key* in leadership. Correction here: the decision process *was* actually initiated quite publicly. It was announced in January, in a thread titled "Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog", which (as you'd guess) linked to a Community Blog post announcing that a decision was to be made under the Open Decision Framework: https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/git-forge-requirements/ thus far, I'd say that was an example of good process, on the face of it. It can be argued that things went wrong later. Earlier posts in this thread have more details on that. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
