Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all. I'm a relative newcomer here and came to take-up the Fedora Jam 
project. I've been following this discussion very closely, and I've got to 
say, that I'm quite disappointed at the way this has been handled.

I'm not a software engineer by trade. I'm an audio engineer with 26 years of 
experience and a degree in leadership. That leadership degree is the hat that 
I want to chime-in with here, and the lens through which I'm viewing this.

On Thursday, April 2, 2020 4:25:53 PM PDT Jeremy Cline wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-04-02 at 11:52 +0100, Leigh Griffin wrote:
> 
> > 
> > The number of active developers on Fedora initiatives has gone up
> > drastically since I joined the team in 2019. You are possibly not
> > seeing that as the team have moved from a model of siloed work on
> > multiple apps, swimming against the tid working 16 hour days, to
> > working on team oriented initiatives to add real value to the
> > ecosystem. So the noise of working on multiple small things at once
> > is not as loud as it was in 2018 which is giving that illusion.
> 
> 
> I'd always suspected my work added no real value, but never had the
> proof. I appreciate the validation 🙂.
> 

Jeremy's comment here struck me to the core. If anybody on any team that I had 
led had mentioned this, I'd be broken-hearted. This is the sign of a complete 
failure at the leadership level. No volunteer or employee should *ever* be 
made to feel this way. Full stop. I have the feeling that Neal is feeling the 
same way. All of that hard work these people have done is being thrown away in 
their faces, and they have nothing to say about it. That is a complete 
leadership failure.

It is apparent in this discussion that the CPE (and especially Leigh) has 
failed in a leadership role. It's very possible that the Fedora Council has 
failed too for allowing this situation to happen. I don't care about the 
technical merits, I simply care about how this is being handled and how people 
are being treated in having their voices taken away from them. I think this 
goes against the whole "Friends" foundation.

The root of this leadership failure seems to be that the discussion happened 
mostly behind closed doors without any announcement *to this list* that this 
was being discussed. Transparency is *key* in leadership.

Honestly, this is making me, someone who came to this project only two months 
ago, wonder if it was, indeed, the right choice. I hope I'm not made to feel 
the same way as Jeremy, and I certainly hope I never make anyone I lead feel 
that way.

----
Erich Eickmeyer
Fedora Jam



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux