On Thu, 2020-04-02 at 20:05 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 8:03 PM Adam Williamson > <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-04-02 at 14:59 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 2:50 PM Steve Grubb <sgrubb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thursday, April 2, 2020 1:55:10 PM EDT Adam Jackson wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2020-04-02 at 13:24 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > I've been doing some testing of F32 and was curious about something. I > > > > > > have a kickstart file that just installs @core to be a minimal system. > > > > > > While looking over the resulting system, there are fonts, wayland, gtk3 > > > > > > and others. Is this intentional? The system probably doesn't have > > > > > > everything that's needs to function as a desktop. Why are all these > > > > > > installed by @core? > > > > > > > > > > Because you're installing with weak dependencies enabled, and one of > > > > > them is bringing in gtk3. > > > > > > > > Thanks for the pointer. Investigating that: > > > > > > > > $ rpm --query --recommends gtk3 > > > > dconf(x86-64) > > > > > > > > Looking at that > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dconf/blob/master/f/dconf.spec > > > > > > > > There is a build requires on gtk-doc. But nowhere do I see gtk3 as a > > > > recommends. > > > > > > > > > > You got that backwards. You listed the things that gtk3 has as a Recommends: > > > > > > Try `dnf repoquery --whatrecommends gtk3` > > > > > > java-11-openjdk-1:11.0.6.10-0.fc32.x86_64 > > > java-11-openjdk-slowdebug-1:11.0.6.10-0.fc32.x86_64 > > > java-latest-openjdk-1:13.0.2.8-1.rolling.fc32.x86_64 > > > java-latest-openjdk-slowdebug-1:13.0.2.8-1.rolling.fc32.x86_64 > > > solaar-0:1.0.2-0.1.rc1.20200322git563ef0d.fc32.noarch > > > > > > > > > That said, I think gtk3 is always part of the standard installation > > > because it's needed by Anaconda. > > > > The GUI anaconda requirements should be split into anaconda-gui and > > that shouldn't be part of a minimal install. In fact I don't think > > anaconda should be pulled into an @core install at all, offhand. > > It shouldn't be listed in @core, it would be pulled in by the bits of > the installer process that needs it. Right, and it isn't listed in @core. Stephen seems to be saying it's normal that @core would pull in anaconda somehow, but I don't think it is. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
