On Wed, 2020-04-01 at 06:11 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 12:39:21 +0200, > Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > * Bruno Wolff, III: > > > > > RHEL is a special case, as CENTOS provides a free drop in replacement > > > and switching from CENTOS to Fedora shouldn't be much work. Is there > > > other proprietary software at the OS level or above, that is used for > > > Fedora infrastructure? > > > > The Bugzilla fork running on bugzilla.redhat.com? > > > > <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478886> > > That was an interesting read. It sounds like corners were cut under the > assumption that there would be no desire to share the code. Specifically > code and config were mixed together and the config can't be released. There's been an ongoing project in RH for the last few years to get RHBZ closer to upstream. It's *much* closer now than it was a few years ago. I haven't looked at the internal fork for a year or so, but last time I did it wasn't a long way away from upstream. So yeah, this is a valid entry in the list, but again it's a very 'grandfathered' one, and one it would be practically very difficult to do much about (trying to unpick Fedora from RHBZ has been talked about more than once but is logistically a very difficult job). -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
