On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 12:30:13PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 01. 04. 20 10:53, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:31:38AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >>I sent out the V2 version of the Change on Friday and then promptly
> >>managed to injure myself and be away from email until today. I've read
> >>through the email threads again this morning and I decided that,
> >>rather than try to address them one by one, I'd try again with a V3
> >>that hopefully answers some of the repeated questions and concerns on
> >>that list.
> >
> >>To enable ELN (once the repository is composed):
> >>
> >>$ dnf install fedora-repos-eln
> >>$ dnf distro-sync
> >
> >I don't see this part explained. Those additional packages will haves
> >NEVRAs always lower than rawhide packages (".eln" < ".fc33".). So this
> >distro-sync will be a noop?
>
> A wild guess: If that repo has lower "cost", will distro-sync prefer
> packages with lower EVR because they come form that repo?
I don't think so: "cost — ... It is useful to make the library prefer
on-disk repositories to remote ones."
But there's a "priority" option: "If there is more than one candidate
package for a particular operation, the one from a repo with the
lowest priority value is picked, possibly despite being less
convenient otherwise (e.g. by being a lower version)."
This should do the trick. The mechanism should be described in the
Change page too.
(Note: I had a sense of deja-vu, because 'priority' was already
discussed in the context of this Change, but it was koji priority for
scheduling tasks, not package installation.)
Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
