Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 12:40:55PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
...snip...
> 
> Because of switching costs, this is likely to prevent us from going back to
> Pagure if it does develop a vibrant independent community. That would be
> unfortunate.

So, currently we are using pagure on src.fedoraproject.org, but it's not
just pagure, it's a integration layer over the top of pagure too. 

I'd like to see if we can, as part of this: a) adjust our packaging
workflow (as many threads on this list have talked about) and b) after
that, try and reduce that integration layer as much as we can and c)
hopefully make it so we could move the backend git repos / forge later
if we wanted to without recreating a big integration layer.

As part of that we could also provide whats needed for the integration
and the pagure community could add anything they don't already have on
their roadmap. 

kevin 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux