On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 12:45:59PM +0100, Leigh Griffin wrote: > We done that as a Management team and with our Product Owner among other > stakeholders. We did evaluate the merit of the requirements from a > practicality perspective but we did not question or force our opinion on > the validity of their asks, as we respect that it serves some demographic > of their stakeholder group. I don't feel it's appropriate for one > stakeholder group to criticise or attack the merits of a requirement from > another group, that's the essence of my point. He's not saying their opinions or asks are invalid or are without some merit, just that one has to evaluate those asks *in some greater context* to determine if they should influence the final decision. That "evaluation" and (even the "greater context") seems to have gone completely missing here, and no, whatever went on in a disused lavatory behind a sign that says "beware of leopard" doesn't count. - Solomon -- Solomon Peachy pizza at shaftnet dot org High Springs, FL ^^ (email/xmpp) ^^ Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
