> Leigh Scott wrote: > > Since when? Why? Where was this discussed? It will 4 years in July. https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/nonfree/nvidia-kmod.git/commit/?id=52cadb0401a80d4c95563880f154d45506f18b9e I believe there may have been a brief discussion between kwizart and me on IRC. They were dropped due to workload and lack of active maintainers' look at the stats. https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/buildsbyuser The infra and release tasks add additional workload. > > A compiler has no business being on end users' systems. Fedora is not > Gentoo. The akmod approach is flawed, independently of Silverblue etc. > Users would still need a compiler to install the nvidia.run file if we stopped providing nvidia or all other kmods. > RPM Fusion used to provide compiled kmod packages for years, and those just > worked. (Well, for the proprietary ones, they only worked as well as > proprietary drivers work to begin with, but that was no fault of the kmod > packages.) So why and when did that stop? > > And the way Silverblue works, it is just not possible for them to support > akmod packages, by design. I consider this a major design flaw in > rpm-ostree. But RPM Fusion refusing to provide binary kmod packages does not > help, either. I don't have any spare time due infra and release tasks, you can do the kmod rebuild tasks if you want them back? > > Kevin Kofler _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
