On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 12:02:40PM -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote: > Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > It is under discussion whether this snapshot will have its own > > installation media. For now the preferred way to test ELN composes > > would be to use standard Fedora Rawhide images and then include ELN as > > an additional repository. > > Is there a dnf change that goes with this to prefer ELN content, then? Yeah, that's something I was trying to figure out too. As discussed before, for rpm '.eln < .fc33', so if the same package is available from both sources, the rawhide one will win. > > ELN artifacts will be made available for testing and development > > purposes, but we will not be shipping any content produced from ELN > > directly to the general public (such as on the standard mirror network > > or via getfedora.org). > > ... > > > > Though it is a System-Wide Change it has no user-facing component. We > > may announce it through other channels. > > I'm confused. This is going to be installable and testable, but has no > user-facing component? What's a user-facing component then? FWIW, I think it's OK to have to first install rawhide and then to enable eln repos on top to have a working installation. Or to do 'dnf --installroot'. Building an an installer image and such doesn't seem necessary, esp. in the beginning. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx