On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:45:47 +1000, Colin Charles <byte@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 07:54 -0700, Stephen J. Smoogen wrote:
Actually, I was waiting for some sort of larger announcement and mailing list
myself. I had put a very little time into it.. but couldnt see who
else was wanting it or doing anything on it. Having a mailing list
would be useful.
It was however decided till the traffic on f-d-l got too high, there would be no stateless linux list. So, why not just use f-d-l in the meantime?
Curiosity about stateless linux was one of the reasons I joined f-d-l. I've heard very little about stateless linux in the last month -- certainly there is another other stuff going on f-d-l that it doesn't seem like a comfortable place to discuss stateless linux.
On the other hand, it could be that stateless linux is dead in the water and there wouldn't be enoug of a critical mass to sustain discussion elsewhere.
I would really like to see the stateless project be revived. It seems like it is a good idea, and I know several people, including myself, who have implemented alternatives after realizing that stateless was no longer being developed. I would be willing to help in this cause if there are enough other people for this to worthwhile.
-- Matthew Eastman Center for Computation & Technology Louisiana State University
