Dne 25. 03. 20 v 16:19 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> Dne 25. 03. 20 v 11:23 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
>> On 25. 03. 20 10:26, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>> I think that the level of involvement of the other maintainers is the
>>> same as what we always did for RHEL. Did RHEL maintainers bothered some
>>> Fedora maintainers with some conditionals and what not? Probably. I
>>> don't see that should be different. The only difference probably is that
>>> that won't be one time effort once in every 3 years, but the flow of
>>> requests will be continuous, but hopefully smaller.
>> Well, not exactly. The RHEL maintainer can try to "bother" the Fedora
>> maintainer with rhel conditionals and when that Fedora maintainer says
>> no, the RHEL maintainer adjust the spec in RHEL only. In many cases
>> that can even be the same person. Assume I want to do something
>> differently in RHEL and Fedora -- I just push the change in RHEL.
>>
>> While there is no way to adjust a spec in ELN only (if I understand
>> the plan correctly). Assume I want to do something differently in ELN
>> and Fedora -- I need to use the conditionals.
>>
>>> Actually, this brings interesting question. It seems to me, that it
>>> would be helpful if RHEL maintainers had blank approval to access the
>>> ELN packages.
>> What are ELN packages? From the proposal, it seems it is all Fedora
>> packages. Or did I get that wrong? Do you propose that RHEL
>> maintainers are automatically provenpackagers (I don't think you do,
>> but I am not sure)?
>
> I assume that there will be "ELN" branch, the same way we have fxx or
> epel branches. Is my assumption wrong? Dunno.
Reading other parts of the thread, it seems I was wrong :( The branching
is not considered ATM, but I still think that is mistake.
Vít
>
>
>>
>> In the ideal world, the RHEL maintainer of "foo" should be at least a
>> comaintainer of "foo" in Fedora, not somebody with "blank approval to
>> access". It is sad that in some cases, the RHEL maintainers are not
>> involved in the corresponding Fedora packages until RHEL N+1 is in
>> progress where they'd just like to dump changes and leave for another
>> few years.
>>
>> But even if the RHEL maintainer is an active and/or primary maintainer
>> of the Fedora package, they don't necessarily want to push %if
>> 0%{?rhel} conditionals to rawhide just to support ELN. What shall they
>> do?
>>
> Yes, right, I am in that boat as I sad on different place :) and again,
> since this is not explicitly mentioned in the proposal, I assume that is
> is something to consider.
>
>
> Vít
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
