On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 07:55:12PM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > On Tuesday, March 24, 2020 5:25:30 AM MST Petr Pisar wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 12:13:57PM +0000, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: > > > I thought the above was saying there were fundamental architectural > > > differences in the way the builds worked, rather than just that people > > > might choose to make different choices in the spec file. > > > > RHEL supports building non-modular RPM packages on top of modules. While > > Fedora forbids it. Probably this is not a fundamental difference, but a big > > one. > > > > I believe the proposed change covers it in the pungi configuration. > > > > -- Petr > > In that case, it looks like this change could potentially fix RHEL if it goes > through? Or are you saying it'd try to force that policy onto Fedora? > I'm saying that the change descibes that ELN will have a separate pungi and tagging configurations. And because tagging default module streams into a build root is based on them, it can allow having default streams in ELN without forcing that policy onto Fedora. Whether it will be so or not is up to the implementation the change owners will choose. So far we heard that the implementation is unclear. -- Petr
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
