Dne 18. 02. 20 v 8:41 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): >> Hm, I'm not seeing these orphaned and I pretty sure I have never maintained them: >> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-Socket-Timeout >> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PerlIO-via-Timeout >> >> bug in the script? > They have been since adapted by @pghmcfc. > > You have never maintained them, but your package depends on them: > > perl-Redis requires perl(IO::Socket::Timeout) > gitolite3 requires perl(Redis) > pagure requires gitolite3 > > (Also perl-IO-Socket-Timeout requires perl(PerlIO::via::Timeout).) > > No bug in the script. Although not the first "I have never maintained those" reaction at all. How to make it easier to understand by affected maintainers? If the email sent to specific maintainers was personalized with the details from the full log, that would probably help. But it is admittedly more work. Or if there were links to the full log. But the log is just plain text ... Vít > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
