On Sun., Feb. 9, 2020, 11:15 a.m. Jerry James, <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 4:21 AM Elliott Sales de Andrade
<quantum.analyst@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Looking at policies, I see one for non-responsive maintainerw [1], but
> I don't think this really applies. There's a page about the package
> review process [2] which mentions several items about non-responsive
> *submitters*, but nothing about reviewers. There's also some mention
> of legal blockers, but not how to ping for clarification there.
> Neither the Join page [3] nor the review guidelines [4] mention
> anything about timelines.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
I don't know why that page is so hard to find. I have to hunt around
for awhile every time I want it. Perhaps there should be a link to it
from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process ?
Ah, thank you. Yes it would definitely be best to link it from somewhere else.
Should it also be moved to policy documents at
(Is it a FESCo policy?)
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
