Hi, I've stumbled upon a regression, and I'm not sure this is a gcc 10 bug or not. Consider the sample program in [1], a simplification of a real case out there [2]. It fails to compile in Fedora Rawhide with the following message: /tmp/cccbVeNV.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/cccbVeNV.s:59: Error: symbol `f' is already defined The example defines two static local pointers to a callback under the same name in two different inline functions that are not static. I'm not sure whether this is entirely correct, given that the C version (removing the extern "C" declaration) throws a warning, but still, previous versions of g++ produce prefixed static symbols that don't collide, and the compilation succeeds. Thoughts? [1] https://gist.github.com/kevinushey/cfa848be2d39ddd110f893d9b6c5ac9c [2] https://github.com/RcppCore/RcppEigen/blob/master/inst/include/RcppEigenStubs.h -- Iñaki Úcar _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
