On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 6:21 AM Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.analyst@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello, > > I've been waiting almost 2 months for my reviewer to respond on my > package request. I pinged and set needinfo some time ago, but still > nothing. My package is FTBFS and FTI in F31, and I've been stuck > because of this. > > Looking at policies, I see one for non-responsive maintainerw [1], but > I don't think this really applies. There's a page about the package > review process [2] which mentions several items about non-responsive > *submitters*, but nothing about reviewers. There's also some mention > of legal blockers, but not how to ping for clarification there. > Neither the Join page [3] nor the review guidelines [4] mention > anything about timelines. > > Now I know there's no _technical_ reason why I can't un-assign a bug, > but I'd rather discuss policy here. > * Who should be pinged, needinfo'd, or otherwise contacted, and after how long? > * If there's a legal question, who should be pinged and when? > * At what point does a packager give up and ask for another reviewer > (by setting back to NEW)? > > [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/ > [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process > [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers > [4] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ReviewGuidelines/ > What is the review you're waiting on? -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
