Re: Change proposal discussion - Optimize SquashFS Size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 03:34:23PM -0500, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 05:22:55PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> >Hardware with low connectivity or low storage (chromebooks, vms)

> Your note about Chromebooks here is good.  I don't have a Chromebook
> and do not know the main issues faced on those systems.

Re-reading, I don't grok this. The compression of the installation
disk or live image is irrelevant to how big the disk of the *target*
machine is. I don't think you'd ever store the live image on a VM,
and even on the chromebook, if it is used for download and needs to
store a temporary copy, a few percent difference wouldn't really matter.
(A permanent difference in installed size would be more meaningful,
but that's not what we're talking about here.)

Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux