Re: Change proposal discussion - Optimize SquashFS Size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le 2020-02-03 17:11, David Cantrell a écrit :

Hi,

We want input from the community on what the main goal should be and
prioritize the rest. For example, is ISO reduction size more important than
improving installation time, for instance?  If so, why?

This is a nonsensical question without defining the target hardware and connectivity.

Hardware with weak CPU (chromebook) and high connectivity (fiber) will want as low compression as possible.

Hardware with low connectivity or low storage (chromebooks, vms) will want the highest possible compression; because I/O limits will wipe out any CPU win, and dnf/packagekit caches get expensive fast.

(chromebooks are problematic in all cases)

Regards,

--
Nicolas Mailhot
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux