Re: LDAP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "CE" == Carwyn Edwards <carwyn@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

CE> I agree though, the whole LDAP/Kerberos server side setup is far
CE> more fiddly than it needs to be atm.

And yet, having been through this myself, I can't see a general way to
make it much easier.  Maybe some automated setup could work for one
specific case (self-signed certificates, kerberos server and LDAP
server on same machine, kerberos realm same as domain name, no
replication, and a host of other simplifying assumptions).

Actually I found that Fedora was rather well prepared for this kind of
thing.  I didn't have to edit /etc/init.d scripts, which is a big
plus.  The only thing I really missed was more automatic support for
Kerberos database propagation.  LDAP was very clean, with slurpd
starting automatically after specifying a replogfile in slapd.conf.

It's going to be a complex system no matter how much automation anyone
does.  What's really needed is better documentation of how the pieces
are supposed to fit together.

 - J<


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux