* Miro Hrončok: > On 22. 01. 20 11:21, Florian Weimer wrote: >> * Felix Schwarz: >> >>> Personally I guess github would attract most contributions for Fedora >>> from new contributors but it is closed source so I'd prefer gitlab for >>> Fedora. >> >> I don't think Github allows disabling pull requests for projects. This >> means that a ptoential Fedora Github service would host content >> submitted by people who have to agreed to the FPCA >> <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:Fedora_Project_Contributor_Agreement>. >> >> Maybe that alone is sufficient to rule out Github? > > We are not the first project to deal with this. Usually, i is sovled > by pots. See for example: > > https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/16012#issuecomment-530664428 Does this really work? This pull request still has the “CLA not signed” label: <https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/18111> But this is not shown clearly in the commit: <https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/d6fd38e2a47af1e75> The red X isn't a relevant indicator. This commit was merged and has it, too: <https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/0d5eac8c327251f8e> I don't know if the branch list (the “master” below the commit subject) is a reliable indicator. This is why I think the bot-based approach needs some review. I also think it's quite rude. The whole FPCA thing feels strange these days. Hopefully there is a better way to make sure that contributions are intended as such. Thanks, Florian _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
