On Wed, 2020-01-22 at 08:40 +0000, Peter Oliver wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jan 2020, 21:32 Michael Catanzaro, <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So if we can agree on that much, then we can avoid wasting time by > > including GitHub in the list of options. That would bring us to a > > choice between GitLab CE and Pagure. (Are there any other serious > > options?) > > In the blog post they state that there aren't. Certainly GitHub and GitLab > have the most momentum. > > I happen to like Phabricator, and appreciate the developer's opinionated > design approach, but perhaps it's right to pick the most mainstream thing > we can with the goal of not wanting to move again for, say, another decade > or so. We used Phabricator for Fedora QA work for a while, before migrating to Pagure. It had some really nice features, but it was quite a lot of work to maintain, and the fact that its workflow is not like Github's and requires some specific tooling would likely be a barrier to contribution since the Github workflow is such a de facto standard these days. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
