Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday, January 21, 2020 2:31:47 PM MST Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 4:04 pm, Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > And any discussion of GitHub isn't going to involve self-hosted, it's
> > going to involve GitHub.com, which means we're talking about losing
> > more of our independence as a project. This is one of those things
> > that I'm not sure is a wise move.
> 
> 
> Well since we have a request for requirements: I propose requirements 
> #1 and #2 are to be self-hosted and open source. I'm suspect the Fedora 
> community would be outraged if we fail to meet either requirement.
> 
> So if we can agree on that much, then we can avoid wasting time by 
> including GitHub in the list of options. That would bring us to a 
> choice between GitLab CE and Pagure. (Are there any other serious 
> options?)
> 
> Michael

Both Gitea and Gogs are potential options, in my opinion, both are lightweight 
and easy to extend.

-- 
John M. Harris, Jr.
Splentity

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux