Re: xinitrc m0x0Cn and you.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rex Dieter wrote:
Mike A. Harris wrote:

I'm currently exploring further modularization of the xinitrc
package, with the following goals in mind:

1) Maximize modularization of all scripts included, in an effort

...

2) Minimize xinitrc package maintenance via modularization,

...

3) Enable 3rd party window manager rpm packagers to provide
   drop-in "it works" functionality that integrates with the
   system without requiring changes to the core of xinitrc.

...

While this concept may (or may not) sound like a large task, it
is seemingly a very very small and simple task IMHO.  I've
attached a very small and simple patch to implement a solution
to this problem to the following bugzilla report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=142260


I had done the essentially the same thing in a couple months ago:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122941#c12
but my suggested patch also removes all switchdesk references, and hard-coded references to gnome/kde (as well as gdm/kdm).

Hmm, yes "Xclients.d" might be a better name for the directory than Xsession.d is. The same script could be used both for *dm startup and startx presumeably.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux