* Neal Gompa:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 4:28 AM Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> We do not want to change the RPM architecture, so that users still can
>> install third-party software. This means that we need to change the
>> dist tag to avoid confusion.
>>
>
> Changing the RPM architecture does not necessarily mean that you
> wouldn't remain compatible with baseline x86_64. For example,
> OpenMandriva's build of the distribution optimized for first
> generation AMD Ryzen systems uses the "znver1" RPM architecture, but
> the "znver1" architecture is deliberately considered compatible with
> x86_64, so packages that are "x86_64" are still installable. There are
> numerous examples of this for 32-bit x86, and there's no reason we
> couldn't do this for 64-bit x86.
But the value of %_arch still changes, right?
I believe this will break things, like this:
| F ?= $(shell test ! -e /etc/fedora-release && echo 0; test -e /etc/fedora-release && rpm --eval %{fedora})
| ARCH ?= $(shell test ! -e /etc/fedora-release && uname -m; test -e /etc/fedora-release && rpm --eval %{_arch})
| MOCK_CFG ?= $(shell test -e /etc/fedora-release && echo fedora-$(F)-$(ARCH))
<https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/blob/1e3b41f65fded91987d4d79c1486b2ccee9f8a9a/GNUmakefile#L127>
Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
